The Religious Freedom Page























Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness

452 U.S. 640


Facts of the Case:

A Minnesota law allowed the state's Agriculture Society to prepare rules regulating the state's fair. One of their decisions was to require organizations wishing to distribute or sell goods to confine their activities to an assigned location. No vendors were permitted to walk the fairgrounds or engage in solicitation. The Krishna group contended that this prevented them from engaging in Sankirtan, their religious ritual in which they go into public place to sell and distribute their religious literature and solicit donations.



Decision:

The Court had a 5-3-1 split over various features of the case. The limitations placed on solicitors were permitted.


Majority Opinion: (Justice White)

The regulations did not directly discriminate against he Krishnas because the space was provided on a first come first serve basis. The fairgrounds were deemed a 'limited public forum' so the use of space could be monitored. Furthermore, the government had a legitimate interest in confining vendors to a designated space because of the need to avoid congestion with the large amounts of pedestrian traffic at the fair. The regulations did not prevent the Krishna's from performing their rituals outside the fairgrounds nor from mingling with the visitors or orally conveying their views. The First Amendment "does not guarantee the right to communicate one's views at all times and places or in any manner that may be desired." In this case, the time, place, and manner restrictions were not based on the communicants' messages. The Krishna's asserted right to "communicate, distribute, and solicit on fairgrounds" is not superior to the similar rights of other (secular) organizations. Both are equally protected by the First Amendment.


Significance:

In this decision the Court does not elevate the rights of the ISOKC above the rights of secular organizations. Also, the limitations placed on the Krishna's do not prevent them from distributing their message, it merely restricts the places from which they may do so.


RealAudio of Oral Argument

[from http://oyez.nwu.edu].

   Oral Argument.

Get the RealAudio Player from Progressive Networks to listen to the argument.





Copyright © The Religious Freedom Page.